Accessibility statementAccessibility statement

This site is designed against WCAG 2.1 Level AA. It has not been through a formal third-party evaluation, so this page says what we checked ourselves, and what we know is still wrong.

Target

WCAG 2.1 Level AA

Assessed by

Us. No third-party evaluation has been carried out.

Method

Automated testing with axe on every page, at desktop and phone widths, in both the day and dusk colors. Contrast calculated for every text and background pair the pages actually show, including text over gradients, with More contrast on and off. Every page used by keyboard alone, including the menus, the settings, the contact form and the questions. Page structure checked on every page: headings, landmarks, link and button names, and form labels. Layout checked at 320 pixels wide and at 200% zoom, and each page checked with reduced motion and with JavaScript switched off. Tested in Chrome.

Last checked

September 25, 2026

We haven’t yet done a full pass with a screen reader or on a physical phone. Until we do, we’re not claiming either.

Display settings

The gear at the top of every page opens three settings. Each one follows your device’s own setting until you change it here, and your choice is kept in this browser only.

Dusk mode switches the site to darker colors.

More contrast strengthens text and backgrounds across the site. With it on, our contrast check found no failures on any page, in either the day or dusk colors.

Reduce motion stops animation, scrolling effects and transitions. Everything that normally animates into place is shown already in place.

Known limitations

Three things on this site do not meet the standard it targets in its default look. All three are contrast problems, and turning on More contrast fixes each of them. They are still ours to fix in the default look.

Some large passages start out faint. A few passages light up word by word as you scroll. Until they do, the unlit words are fainter than the standard allows, and if you stop partway, part of the sentence stays faint. Screen readers get the whole sentence. More contrast or Reduce motion shows every word at full strength. This is WCAG 1.4.3.

Small orange labels on the case study cards are too light. In the day colors, on the tinted cards, they fall just short of the contrast the standard asks for at that size. This is WCAG 1.4.3.

The client name under a case study quote is slightly too light. In the day colors, on the Watercraft Connection case study, it falls just short. This is WCAG 1.4.3.

If you find something that is not on this list, it means we have not found it yet. Please tell us.

If you hit a barrier

If you hit a barrier on this site, tell us. Describe the page and what happened, and we’ll fix it.

We would rather hear about it than have it stay on the list of things nobody mentioned.

Tell us what happened